Chastity

Comments

i have to admit, i don't understand what he's saying, exactly. is there a less sophisticated way of restating all this for lay people like me?
I have to say, I didn't get it until recently. And even then, it might be my subjective opinion.

I think it has to do with keeping what you consider "love" for the other person from preventing you from being genuinely connected to yourself and to them. So often we get caught up in the "high" of romantic flirtation and sex, and it comes to a point where you want the other person for what they make you feel, not for who they are. It turns you in on yourself more than it turns you outward towards them.

But the truest love is you in touch with your deepest self directly connected to the other person's deepest self. No egoism or self-orientation whatsoever. The deepest love is chaste.

But so few of us ever get there.
Oh, and once you get there, sex and romance can take on an entirely different and more deep and spiritual meaning. :)
You might like Dietrich von Hildebrand's In Defense of Purity. It sounds like there's some overlap of thought.
Thanks for the rec. I'll have to check it out. :)

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in