Phillip Pullman is such a Gnostic

Comments

[this is good]
I think you're right on the money. I've been saying this about Pullman for years...
I just recently read the books. I spent almost the whole time completely enthralled by them for their spiritual implications, seeing as I heavily identify with mysticism in general. But I just started learning more about Gnosticism in particular and I keep noticing all these little tidbits of information that, for me, started when I read His Dark Materials. :)
Milton, whom Pullman imitates and subverts, was a quasi-Gnostic himself. If you've ever read Paradise Lost, you'll notice that the Son has been demoted from being the Second Person of the Trinity to the status of some sort of demiurgic creator. I wonder if Pullman chose Milton to pick on because he was an easier target than the more orthodox poets like Dante.
So you think Pullman was actually subverting the message of Gnosticism? Or am I reading you wrong?
No, just that Pullman's apparent Gnosticism isn't very far from the source. He's subverting orthodox Christianity, and using some of Milton's tools to do it.
Ahhh I see, thanks for the clarification. :)
He's clearly drawn from a range of esoteric sources to create a deeply thought provoking allegory and a terrific story all in one. Why I never read this stuff before now I don't know, all three in three weeks - awesome. And...as a bloke I had to really control the lump in the throat and the teary eyes on the bus when reading TAS...how did that happen!! I can't walk past park bench now in the same way...

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in